Skip to main content

A Foggy Memory of my Rulerships Hypotheses

I haven't done a lot of SERIOUS astrology in recent years and I didn't write down my ideas about rulership. I had this fairly elaborate set of ideas about how to group stuff and yadda and I don't really remember all that stuff. Maybe over time more of it will come back to me.

Here are some hypotheses I DO remember having about how we should consider updating our rulerships:

As noted previously, we really need to assign rulership to the Earth. I think Taurus makes the most sense, but someone should look into that and see if data supports this idea.

Venus is listed as ruler of both Taurus and Libra. I think it doesn't make sense for EITHER ONE. I propose that Libra is ruled by the asteroid belt.

I've always felt Librans tend to be kind of scattered and this Asteroid Belt from what I gather was supposedly a planet in the making that fell apart. There is enough mass there for a planet, it's just scattered.

SOME astologers already track Chiron in the chart, though it does not have rulership, etc. Chiron is kind of a funky little wandering heavenly body that sometimes gets described as an asteroid and I don't see why we can't do the research and see if it makes sense to use it as an important asteroid to track info about Libra, sort of the important asteroid that serves as a mouthpiece for the asteroid belt.

This would free up Venus and I feel like we could probably designate Venus as the ruler of Virgo instead of having Virgo -- an Earth sign -- share Mercury with Gemini -- an Air sign.

Currently, a lot of heavenly bodies get designated the ruler of more than one sign because rulerships were originally based on what could be seen with the naked eye and astrologers didn't count the Earth. I think if we include the Earth as one of the nine planets, PLUS the Sun, the Moon and Asteroid Belt (with potentially Chiron being used as a representative of the Asteroid Belt), then we have twelve signs and TWELVE heavenly bodies to designate as rulers.

We can start to untangle this mess rooted in astrologers doing the best they could with the information to which they had access -- aka what they could see in the sky with the naked eye before telescopes were invented.

Footnote

IF you take these ideas and run with them, PLEASE do NOT follow a policy of confirmation bias.

Get DATA. If "Chiron as mouthpiece for the asteroid belt" fails to make any fucking sense based on DATA, GO LOOK FOR ANOTHER asteroid as a potential mouthpiece for the asteroid belt.

Do NOT try to force-fit your DATA to MY HYPOTHESIS. That's IDIOCY.

Popular posts from this blog

House of Style

I defy every color typing system I have ever run across. Rest assured if some particular typing system doesn't work for you, I am sympathetic. No color system works for me, but my astrological chart fits my colors. So, weirdly, I found astrology helpful for sorting out my wardrobe, of all things. I briefly had a separate site for talking about astrology and fashion. This post is step one in the process of folding that information into this site and shutting that one down. That site was a half baked idea for a long time and was finally being developed because I am fleshing out my ideas for a clothing line that's been a half baked idea for even longer. That site was originally envisioned as my latest attempt to try to figure out how to make money via my knowledge of astrology that never turned into a viable business idea, as noted here recently . You can use your Natal astrological chart to try to look your best by looking primarily at your Rising Sign and any factors re...
Read more

Japan -- A Funny Little Hypothesis

My understanding is that most Japanese do not believe in Western astrology and, yet, it's a common topic of discussion. They routinely tell people what their Sun sign is in casual conversation. I think most likely what is going on there is that they don't find it threatening because they don't take it seriously, so it's a good topic for making small talk, and it also solves a somewhat unique social challenge for them. In Japanese language and culture, my understanding is you address people using honorifics on a routine basis and there is a long list of honorifics to choose from. Which one is correct depends in part on which of you is older. All well, fine and good except that it's rude to ask someone their age or birth date. So how does one determine who is older and who is younger? Sometimes this is obvious. A child addressing a grown-up, for example. Anyone can tell at a glance who is older and who is younger. But what if you are all school children in t...
Read more

Aries Rising

I have an Aries Rising Sign with several exact aspects to it and Aries rules hair. In line with that, I have great hair and my hair has a life and mind of its own. In my youth, I felt I had difficult hair. It was naturally wavy, except in one spot in front where it was mostly straight and this helped make hairstyles challenging. It was also fragile and got fried if I used a hair dryer too much or curling iron.  Under the David Kibbe typing system, I'm a Soft Dramatic. Kibbe recommends a slightly asymmetrical hairstyle for Soft Dramatics and that works well for me in part because it helps hide the weirdness where this one patch of hair is less curly. Or was.  In recent months, my hair has decided to go mostly STRAIGHT all over for the first time ever as a fun new trick for reasons I cannot fathom beyond: My hair has always just done whatever it felt like doing without consulting me while people complimented me on "dying" it or "adding highlights" and I struggled ...
Read more