Gist of the Gemini

So you read my last post  and you're an astrologer and want to start doing this one day-at-time Sun Sign astrology. Where to start? How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time.   Don't make any big dramatic announcements. If you have a website, Twitter account or other online channel for publishing stuff, start where you are and come up with a schedule that makes sense to you. If you Tweet DAILY, do "Today's birthday..." If you blog once a week, do "This week's birthday kids." Ideally, then ADD at least the date and approximate degree of X sign to a CHART for people to consult. In the future when you write about things like transits, make sure you give exact degrees rather than hand wavy generalizations.  Start saying over and over "IF you have your Natal Chart, any heavenly body at THIS degree of ANY sign will feel some sort of impact. If you don't have your custom chart, look up your birthday on this work-in-progress chart of Sun positi...

So someone using a program to cast charts may not be qualified to help space agencies or space companies figure out how to use astrological charts as gravity maps to improve space navigation. That doesn't necessarily mean they aren't worth paying for life advice, which is what most people want out of it. I have a lot of criticisms of popular or sun sign  astrology, such as: Canned astrology   A Foggy Memory of my Rulerships Hypotheses   The Secret Sauce   Earth, The Final Frontier   I LIKE astrology. I found   it useful to help me figure out me. I would like to see it return to being a respected source of good advice like it once was. Some areas I wish we would work on: 1. Update Rulerships and base it on something more substantive than whatever it's currently based on. 2. Rename or rebrand it because it never was the study of the stars. It was the study of the wandering stars -- planets visible to the naked eye without use of a telescope --  and othe...

The rising sign changes signs every TWO HOURS because there are 12 signs and 24 hours in the day. Being off by an hour means half the people will be told the wrong rising sign. And ALL people will be told the wrong degree which impacts aspects and transits. How much does it matter that we have a dozen house systems and fundamentally don't agree on house details if you are an engineer at NASA? I have absolutely no idea. I'm guessing the big information is stuff like "Planets that form a 90 degree angle to Earth at launch time or to the current path of travel of some space vehicle will create a high energy gulf stream, so to speak, which can potentially cause problems OR get used  to rapidly ride that wave to where you are going." Will NASA need to "correct" existing astrological lore about house systems to use this information? My two answers are No and Not Necessarily.  So I once had this  get rich quick scheme  where I was going to offer to do a quick and ...

If you work for a space agency or company and want to take my hypothesis seriously that astrological charts are geocentric maps of the solar system which can be used as Gravity Maps for improving navigation, you should get a sailor experienced with sailed vessels and a serious astrologer who knows the math to help you figure this out. The punchline   is it was a lat-long (latitude longitude) calculation and I knew he was wrong because I'm an astrologer. Calculating lat-long for WHERE someone was born or the event in question took place is part of every chart. I was getting my Certificate in GIS from UC-Riverside which shares staff with ESRI because ESRI is in the same gepgraphic area. They are essentially co-located, or close enough for ESRI staff to moonlight as UC-Riverside professors for the occasional class here and there.  ESRI is the world leader in GIS software, so I have world class GIS education and I was better than my classmates at understanding things like lat-lon...

If the movie Hidden Figures is at all historically accurate, they solved their unsolvable navigation issue with Euler's Method, which is called old math in the movie. Astrology is old math for mapping the gravitational ripples we need to understand for navigating between planets, like a sailing ship on the sea. An astrological chart is a geocentric map of the solar system full of notes about interactions between the gravitational wakes and eddies of other heavenly bodies as we experience those gravitational pressures on Earth. You just need to translate it to a space flight navigation tool.  It already has a rich history of observations of turbulence, dead zones, high pressure zones, harmonic confluence etc. Figuring out how to translate thousands of years of observations such as "When planets change direction, you are in for a bumpy few days." to space weather flight turbulence will give you access to a wealth of existing knowledge about gravitational sea waves, so to ...

Aspects are the angles in an astrological chart. It's a map of a point in time of a solar system where everything is in motion. Transits are current and future motion and show how those bodies are currently interacting with each other or how they relate to points in someone's natal chart.

Here are the most commonly cited aspects in astrology and the mathematical angle they represent: Opposition: 180 degrees apart Trine: 120 degrees apart Square: 90 degrees apart Sextile: 60 degrees apart Conjunction: 0 degrees apart Again, it's a geocentric map. A square is two heavenly bodies at a 90 degree angle as seen from earth.  I fundamentally do not  agree with classifications of "good" influences and "bad" influences in traditional astrology.  Traditionally, a square and an opposition are bad influences.  I find it more useful to think of them as high energy aspects. Charts with no  oppositions or squares are "losers" who go nowhere. Too many of them and you have a drama queen unlikely to get their act together.  Trines are traditionally seen as "good" aspects. It's more accurate to think of them as stable harmonics. Keep in mind you can bring a bridge down with harmonics of that sort. If it matches up the right way, the motion a...